News & Press Releases
A Missouri-based law firm that specializes in rails-to-trails litigation is representing more than 100 landowners whose property rights will impacted by the proposed Shenandoah Rail Trail.
Stewart, Wald and McCulley said in a statement that it expects to file a lawsuit on the landowners’ behalf when the federal government approves the conversion of a 48.5-mile stretch of railroad line from Broadway to Front Royal for the Shenandoah Rail Trail.
A Missouri-based litigation law firm specializing in rails-to-trails litigation won $142,600 from the federal government for two landowners in Yelm who lost land as a result of the Yelm-Rainier-Tenino Trail extension in the city.
The law firm — Stewart, Wald & McCulley — is one of only a few firms that specialize in rails-to-trails litigation in the country, according to a news release from the firm.
The landowners who received the settlement own land along a 4.57-mile stretch of the abandoned railway spanning from Yelm to Roy, part of the Yelm Prairie Line extension of the Yelm-Rainier-Tenino Trail.
The entire litigation references the time in the late 1860s when The Northern Pacific Railway Company was granted a railroad easement to establish rail service in Yelm and Roy. Most recently operated by the city of Yelm, the line was abandoned by the city in May 2020 to make way for the trail extension.
Stewart, Wald & McCulley, a Missouri law firm specializing in Rails-to-Trails litigation has recovered $4.5 Million from the federal government on behalf of twenty-one landowners as a result of the Atlanta BeltLine conversion in Atlanta, Georgia.
Stewart, Wald & McCulley, a Missouri litigation law firm specializing in Rails-to-Trails litigation, has recovered $142,600 from the federal government on behalf of 2 landowners as a result of the Yelm-Tenino Trail conversion in the City of Yelm, Thurston County, Washington.
Stewart, Wald & McCulley, the nation’s leading and only fully dedicated Rails-to-Trails litigation law firm, has recovered $355,000 on behalf of 7 landowners from the federal government, in the United States Court of Federal Claims, as a result of the Atlantic & Yadkin Greenway rail-trail conversion in Greensboro, North Carolina.
Stewart, Wald & McCulley, in a unique case, recently achieved a $327,000.00 settlement on behalf of clients who owned approximately 50 parcels of land in rural Decatur, Norton, and Phillips Counties, Kansas.
Not only did their clients receive compensation for temporary taking claims, they also received their land back. Stewart, Wald & McCulley originally filed the lawsuit against the United States Government in October 2015 following the Notice of Interim Trail Use (NITU) filed on October 22, 2015. The request for trail use was filed shortly thereafter.
SANTA ROSA (BCN) — In a federal lawsuit filed last week in San Francisco, dozens of landowners from Sonoma and Marin counties accused Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit of a land grab.
At issue is the “multi-use pathway” that SMART is building on a 43-mile stretch between Airport Boulevard in Sonoma County and San Rafael in Marin County. According to a progress report on its website, SMART has completed 24 miles of pathway and another 8.8 miles are “fully funded and planned for construction.”
NORTH BAY, CA — In a federal lawsuit filed last week in San Francisco, dozens of landowners from Sonoma and Marin counties accused Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit of a land grab.
At issue is the "multi-use pathway" that SMART is building on a 43-mile stretch between Airport Boulevard in Sonoma County and San Rafael in Marin County. According to a progress report on its website, SMART has completed 24 miles of pathway and another 8.8 miles are "fully funded and planned for construction."
Landowners seek just compensation from the federal government under the 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution for the taking of their property; lawsuit does not attempt to stop the rail-to-trail conversion
A Missouri-based law firm that specializes in rails-to-trails cases plans to file a federal lawsuit on behalf of property owners along the Nickel Plate Railroad corridor.
Washington, D.C. – On Aug. 1, Stewart Wald & McCulley LLC, a Kansas City, Missouri legal firm claiming to have settled “nearly all the largest rails-to-trails cases to date” filed a lawsuit against the United States government on behalf of more than 50 plaintiffs who own property along the planned Salmonberry Trail route between Banks and Tillamook.
Stewart, Wald & McCulley recovered $2.6 million for 184 landowners in Pulaski County, Arkansas, the firm announced today.
The plaintiffs own land located along a four-mile stretch of the Levy Trail, a recreational path in North Little Rock. In 1917 and 1919, the right of way had been granted on this property to the Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. The rail line was eventually transferred to the Union Pacific Railroad Co., which operated the corridor before abandoning the track.
In 2010, the City of North Little Rock requested to use the defunct railroad track for a bicycle and pedestrian trail. The Surface Transportation Board approved the project – which would become the Levy Trail – later that year under the National Trails System Act.
THREE TOP RAINMAKERS BREAK OFF FROM BAKER STERCHI
"Three of Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice's top revenue-makers have left and formed their own firm in Kansas City, according to court documents. A document filed Tuesday in relation to a rails-to-trails case stated that Thomas S. Stewart and Elizabeth McCulley, who represent the plaintiffs in the case, "are no longer associated with Baker Sterchi Cowden & Rice" and have formed a new law firm, Stewart Wald & McCulley. Steven Wald, another former Baker Sterchi attorney based in St. Louis, is listed as the registered agent on the Missouri Secretary of State's website. The three attorneys have worked on rails-to-trails cases for the firm, including one that settled for $33 million in 2013 and included a nearly $11 million contingency fee, and another case that settled for $141 million. "The firm will continue to have its own trails practice group going forward," Kreamer said. "We wish them well, I think they probably wish us well as well."
-Catherine Martin, April 15, 2015 (Missouri Lawyers Weekly)
Did you receive our mailer, or have any questions for us? We’re here to help you take the next step for just compensation.
Notable Success Examples
In Haggart v. United States, our attorneys recovered $177,400,000 on behalf of 254 landowners in King County, Washington, along a 25.45-mile trail.
In Raulerson v. United States, our attorneys recovered $33,300,000 on behalf of 264 landowners in Beaufort County, South Carolina, along a 25.05-mile trail.
In Smith v. United States, our attorneys recovered $26,477,000 on behalf of 29 landowners in King County, Washington, along a 25.45-mile trail.
In Ansley Walk v. United States, our attorneys recovered $18,416,000 on behalf of 5 landowners in Fulton County, Georgia, along a 1-mile trail.
In Furlong v. United States, our attorneys recovered $14,200,000 on behalf of 272 landowners in Albany, New York, along a 10.94-mile trail.